RE: [PATCH v7][4/4] dt-bindings: mmc: Add dt-bindings for realtek mmc driver

[Jyan Chou [周芷安]]

>>> +      clocks = <&cc 22>, <&cc 26>, <&cc 121>, <&cc 122>;
>>> +      clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "vp0", "vp1";
>>
>> Where is the DTS implementing this binding?
>>
>>> I said it once:
>>
>>>> I asked you to test the bindings. This also means that you must test 
>>>> your DTS against bindings. Your bindings, DTS and driver do not 
>>>> match, therefore let's be a bit more clear:
>>>>
>>>> NAK, till you upstream your DTS.
>>
>>> I still do not see DTS anywhere. Please link it.
>>
>> Sorry for asking. Which dts do we need to link it? The device tree we use for our SOC?
>>
>> or realtek,rtd-dw-cqe-emmc.example.dts?  Thanks.

> The patch adding this device node to any upstream DTS. I am not speaking about example, but about upstream DTS using this MMC.

> As I wrote last time, I don't believe you test bindings and DTS and I had proofs of that. Therefore I expect you to upstream DTS of your product.

Sorry for explaining, since our DTS is still trying to upstream, but not accepted by upstream yet,

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/4a462b2e-380a-9fd1-2e84-783cc457e8c2@xxxxxxxxxx/T/

could I provide the dts we local used now for you first to compare with bindings? I am sorry for making this request.

Best regards,
Jyan

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 3:37 PM
To: Jyan Chou [周芷安] <jyanchou@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx; riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx; doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; tonyhuang.sunplus@xxxxxxxxx; abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx; william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7][4/4] dt-bindings: mmc: Add dt-bindings for realtek mmc driver


External mail.



On 22/11/2023 03:54, Jyan Chou [周芷安] wrote:
>> +      clocks = <&cc 22>, <&cc 26>, <&cc 121>, <&cc 122>;
>> +      clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "vp0", "vp1";
>
>> Where is the DTS implementing this binding?
>
>> I said it once:
>
>>> I asked you to test the bindings. This also means that you must test 
>>> your DTS against bindings. Your bindings, DTS and driver do not 
>>> match, therefore let's be a bit more clear:
>>>
>>> NAK, till you upstream your DTS.
>
>> I still do not see DTS anywhere. Please link it.
>
> Sorry for asking. Which dts do we need to link it? The device tree we use for our SOC?
>
> or realtek,rtd-dw-cqe-emmc.example.dts?  Thanks.

The patch adding this device node to any upstream DTS. I am not speaking about example, but about upstream DTS using this MMC.

As I wrote last time, I don't believe you test bindings and DTS and I had proofs of that. Therefore I expect you to upstream DTS of your product.

Best regards,
Krzysztof