Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Remove unused member in struct lpi_pingroup

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:14:09AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 20/11/2023 20:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The group is not used anywhere, remove it. And if needed, it should be
> > > struct pingroup anyway.
> > > 
> > > While at it, replace kernel.h with what exactly being used.
> > 
> > Missing Reported-by and Closes by for LKP... Unless you discovered it
> > without its report?
> 
> It's just at hand discovery.
> 
> > Missing sm8550.
> 
> And sm8650, but there LPI_FUNCTION(gpio) and I'm wondering why LKP complains
> about it. It's really a maze to me.

Ah, this is _pins, _groups is still in use. Okay, I will remove that in next
version.

> > >  #define LPI_PINGROUP(id, soff, f1, f2, f3, f4)		\
> > >  	{						\
> > > -		.group.name = "gpio" #id,			\
> > > -		.group.pins = gpio##id##_pins,		\
> > 
> > Aren't these used by core pinctrl code?
> 
> Only via APIs and pin control registered them also via APIs, so I don't think
> this is being used directly. But if you see how, tell me! I spent already a few
> hours on this and haven't got any clear picture in my mind.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko