Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree

From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Wed Nov 22 2023 - 15:27:12 EST

Next message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/msm/adreno: Add support for SM7150 SoC machine"
Previous message: Marijn Suijten: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy_irq in bindings"
In reply to: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree"
Next in thread: Tanmay Shah: "[PATCH v7 3/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: add pm domains support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:42:38AM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > ZynqMP TCM information is fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
> > is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
> > as per new bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v7:
> > - move checking of pm_domain_id from previous patch
> > - fix mem_bank_data memory allocation
> >
> > drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > index 22bccc5075a0..270af73344ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ struct mbox_info {
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > - * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are
> > - * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel
> > + * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will stay in driver to maintain backward
> > + * compatibility with device-tree that does not have TCM information.
> > */
> > static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = {
> > {0xffe00000UL, 0x0, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> > @@ -587,12 +587,21 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> > pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> >
> > - ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> > - ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> > - ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> > - goto release_tcm_split;
> > + /*
> > + * If TCM information is available in device-tree then
> > + * in that case, pm domain framework will power on/off TCM.
> > + * In that case pm_domain_id is set to 0. If hardcode
> > + * bindings from driver is used, then only this driver will
> > + * use pm_domain_id.
> > + */
> > + if (pm_domain_id) {
> > + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> > + goto release_tcm_split;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%llx, da=0x%x, size=0x%lx",
> > @@ -604,7 +613,8 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > bank_name);
> > if (!rproc_mem) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > + if (pm_domain_id)
> > + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > goto release_tcm_split;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -617,7 +627,8 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> > pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> > - zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > + if (pm_domain_id)
> > + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > }
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -659,13 +670,16 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> >
> > /* Turn on each TCM bank individually */
> > - ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> > - ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> > - ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x",
> > - pm_domain_id);
> > - goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> > +
> > + if (pm_domain_id) {
> > + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM 0x%x",
> > + pm_domain_id);
> > + goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->size;
> > @@ -683,7 +697,8 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > bank_name);
> > if (!rproc_mem) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > + if (pm_domain_id)
> > + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > goto release_tcm_lockstep;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -700,7 +715,8 @@ static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
> > /* If failed, Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
> > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> > pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> > - zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > + if (pm_domain_id)
> > + zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id);
> > }
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -931,6 +947,8 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_add_pm_domains(struct rproc *rproc)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > fail_add_pm_domains_lockstep:
> > while (--j >= 0) {
> > device_link_del(r5_core->pm_dev_core1_link[j]);
> > @@ -1012,7 +1030,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
> > pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
> > - if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
> > + if (pm_domain_id && zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
> > dev_warn(r5_core->dev,
> > "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
> > }
> > @@ -1087,6 +1105,83 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > }
> >
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > +{
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > + int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret;
> > + struct platform_device *cpdev;
> > + struct mem_bank_data *tcm;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + u64 abs_addr, size;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
> > + dev = r5_core->dev;
> > + np = dev_of_node(dev);
> > +
> > + /* we have address cell 2 and size cell as 2 */
> > + ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "reg",
> > + if (ret <= 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "can't get reg property err %d\n", ret);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tcm_bank_count = ret;
>
> This is useless - please use @tcm_bank_count instead of @ret above.
>

I am done reviewing this set.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> > +
> > + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
> > + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> > + for (j = 0; j < tcm_bank_count; j++) {
> > + tcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!tcm)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] = tcm;
> > +
> > + /* get tcm address without translation */
> > + ret = of_property_read_reg(np, j, &abs_addr, &size);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * remote processor can address only 32 bits
> > + * so convert 64-bits into 32-bits. This will discard
> > + * any unwanted upper 32-bits.
> > + */
> > + tcm->da = (u32)abs_addr;
> > + tcm->size = (u32)size;
> > +
> > + cpdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > + res = platform_get_resource(cpdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, j);
> > + if (!res) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get tcm resource\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tcm->addr = (u32)res->start;
> > + tcm->bank_name = (char *)res->name;
> > + res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, tcm->addr, tcm->size,
> > + tcm->bank_name);
> > + if (!res) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to request tcm resource\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
> > * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
> > @@ -1165,10 +1260,19 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
> > struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > int ret, i;
> >
> > - ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
> > + if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL)) {
> > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node from dt, err %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

Next message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/msm/adreno: Add support for SM7150 SoC machine"
Previous message: Marijn Suijten: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy_irq in bindings"
In reply to: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree"
Next in thread: Tanmay Shah: "[PATCH v7 3/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: add pm domains support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]