Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: Fix power domain scaling

[Ulf Hansson]

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 08:39, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 14-11-23, 11:07, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > The power domain scaling setup for QCS404 and MSM8909 in
> > cpufreq-com-nvmem does not work correctly at the moment because the
> > genpd core ignores all the performance state votes that are specified in
> > the CPU OPP table. This happens because nothing in the driver makes the
> > genpd core aware that the power domains are actively being consumed by
> > the CPU.
> >
> > Fix this by marking the devices as runtime active. Also mark the devices
> > to be in the "awake path" during system suspend so that performance
> > state votes necessary for the CPU are preserved during system suspend.
> >
> > While all the patches in this series are needed for full functionality,
> > the cpufreq and pmdomain patches can be merged independently. There is
> > no compile-time dependency between those two.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Drop patches with MSM8909 definitions that were applied already
> > - Add extra patch to fix system suspend properly by using
> >   device_set_awake_path() instead of dev_pm_syscore_device()
> > - Set GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP for rpmpd so that performance state votes
> >   needed by the CPU are preserved during suspend
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018-msm8909-cpufreq-v2-0-0962df95f654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Applied. Thanks.
>
> I picked the pmdomain patch too, lemme know if that needs to go via
> some other tree.

Usually I should pick the pmdomain patches. Although, I thought it may
be better to keep this series together.

Assuming you are going to send these as fixes for 6.7-rc[n]? In that
case, I can just rebase my tree on a later rc if I find any problems.

Kind regards
Uffe