Re: [PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Thu Nov 23 2023 - 15:58:02 EST

Next message: Philipp Hortmann: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable TXCountToDataRate"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "[PATCH v2 2/2] x86/smp: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg in native_stop_other_cpus()"
In reply to: Heiner Kallweit: "[PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON"
Next in thread: Heiner Kallweit: "Re: [PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Series was created supported by Coccinelle and its splitpatch.

I don't know splitpatch. However, I don't understand its result. Why
isn't there one patch for all in drivers/i2c/busses? Also, the subject
prefix should be plain "i2c: <do x for all drivers>" or something.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Philipp Hortmann: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable TXCountToDataRate"
Previous message: Uros Bizjak: "[PATCH v2 2/2] x86/smp: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg in native_stop_other_cpus()"
In reply to: Heiner Kallweit: "[PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON"
Next in thread: Heiner Kallweit: "Re: [PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]