On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:27:39PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:In [PATCH v4 1/4] bus: mhi: host: Add spinlock to protect WP access when queueing
Ensure read and write locks for the channel are not taken in succession byIs this patch trying to fix an existing issue in client drivers or a potential
dropping the read lock from parse_xfer_event() such that a callback given
to client can potentially queue buffers and acquire the write lock in that
process. Any queueing of buffers should be done without channel read lock
acquired as it can result in multiple locks and a soft lockup.
issue in the future drivers?
Even if you take care of disabled channels, "mhi_event->lock" acquired during
mhi_mark_stale_events() can cause deadlock, since event lock is already held by
mhi_ev_task().
I'd prefer not to open the window unless this patch is fixing a real issue.
- Mani
Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
index 6c6d253..c4215b0 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ static int parse_xfer_event(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
mhi_del_ring_element(mhi_cntrl, tre_ring);
local_rp = tre_ring->rp;
+ read_unlock_bh(&mhi_chan->lock);
+
/* notify client */
mhi_chan->xfer_cb(mhi_chan->mhi_dev, &result);
@@ -667,6 +669,8 @@ static int parse_xfer_event(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
kfree(buf_info->cb_buf);
}
}
+
+ read_lock_bh(&mhi_chan->lock);
}
break;
} /* CC_EOT */
--
2.7.4