Re: [PATCH v4 10/53] perf record: Be lazier in allocating lost samples buffer
From: Ian Rogers
Date: Mon Nov 27 2023 - 17:33:22 EST
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:03 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > Wait until a lost sample occurs to allocate the lost samples buffer,
> > often the buffer isn't necessary. This saves a 64kb allocation and
> > 5.3kb of peak memory consumption.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 9b4f3805ca92..b6c8c1371b39 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -1924,21 +1924,13 @@ static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
> > static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> > {
> > struct perf_session *session = rec->session;
> > - struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost;
> > + struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost = NULL;
> > struct evsel *evsel;
> >
> > /* there was an error during record__open */
> > if (session->evlist == NULL)
> > return;
> >
> > - lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> > - if (lost == NULL) {
> > - pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> > - return;
> > - }
>
> Shouldn't we take the time here and instead improve this error message
> and then propagate the error?
>
> For instance, we may want to still get some perf.data file without these
> records but inform the user at this point how many records were lost
> (count.lost)?
Sounds like a follow-up, the messages here are just moving the
existing message and the point of the patch is to postpone/avoid a
memory allocation when possible.
Thanks,
Ian
> - Arnaldo
>
> > -
> > - lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> > -
> > evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
> > struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id;
> > u64 lost_count;
> > @@ -1961,6 +1953,14 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> > }
> >
> > if (count.lost) {
> > + if (!lost) {
> > + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> > + if (!lost) {
> > + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> > + }
> > __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost,
> > x, y, count.lost, 0);
> > }
> > @@ -1968,9 +1968,18 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> > }
> >
> > lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
> > - if (lost_count)
> > + if (lost_count) {
> > + if (!lost) {
> > + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> > + if (!lost) {
> > + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> > + }
> > __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count,
> > PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
> > + }
> > }
> > out:
> > free(lost);
> > --
> > 2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
> >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo