RE: [PATCH v10 1/6] iommu: Change kconfig around IOMMU_SVA

[Zhang, Tina]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 2:25 AM
> To: Zhang, Tina <tina.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lu
> Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>; Robin
> Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Shavit <mshavit@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] iommu: Change kconfig around IOMMU_SVA
> 
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:20:13AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:14:17AM +0000, Zhang, Tina wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:05:20AM +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linus suggested that the kconfig here is confusing:
> > > > >
> > > > > While this patch looks decent to me, you forgot to Cc Linus on
> > > > > it. In general, given that it touches a couple of core files,
> > > > > I'd like to wait for some more people to have a look at it and not rushing
> anything in.
> > > > Make sense. I'll CC Linus. Comments are welcome.
> >
> > > Can we separate this patch? I'm thinking about CC more people for
> > > review. At least, we need to CC all the reviewers of
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230506133134.1492395-1-
> jacob.jun.pan@l
> > > inux.intel.com/ to this patch. So, it seems more reasonable to
> > > separate this patch. What do you think?
> >
> > I think that makes sense, let's go ahead with the rest of the SVA
> > series and we can do this next cycle. Bikeshedding config names isn't
> > really critical.
> 
> So this didn't make it even without the config change :(
> 
> Can you please resend it again and CC the right please please. This needs to go
> into this cycle for sure
Sure.

Regards,
-Tina
> 
> Thanks
> Jason