Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't complain on _Static_assert and _Generic use

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 27/11/2023 16.18, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> Improve CamelCase recognition logic to avoid reporting on _Static_assert()
> and _Generic() use.
> 

_Generic I understand, because that can reasonably be used in new macros.

But is there ever any reason for introducing new uses of _Static_assert
when we already have the static_assert() wrapper? Shouldn't people use
that instead of the raw keyword?

> Other C keywords, such as _Bool, are intentionally omitted, as those
> should be rather avoided in new source code.

... in exactly the same way that we have 'typedef _Bool bool;' and then
prefer people to spell it 'bool'.

Rasmus