Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base X1E80100 dtsi and the QCP dts

From: Sibi Sankar
Date: Wed Nov 29 2023 - 04:26:15 EST




On 11/18/23 06:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 17.11.2023 12:39, Sibi Sankar wrote:
From: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add base dtsi and QCP board (Qualcomm Compute Platform) dts file for
X1E80100 SoC, describing the CPUs, GCC and RPMHCC clock controllers,
geni UART, interrupt controller, TLMM, reserved memory, interconnects,
SMMU and LLCC nodes.

Co-developed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]

+&tlmm {
+ gpio-reserved-ranges = <33 3>, <44 4>, /* SPI (TPM) */
Surely SPI doesn't use 7 wires! :D

yeah, they are just secure reserved unused gpios.


[...]

+ L2_0: l2-cache-0 {
the cache device is distinguishable by its parent, so "l2-cache" is enough

thanks will fix ^^



+ compatible = "cache";
+ cache-level = <2>;
+ cache-unified;
+ };
+ };
+
[...]

+ idle-states {
+ entry-method = "psci";
+
+ CLUSTER_C4: cpu-sleep-0 {
+ compatible = "arm,idle-state";
+ idle-state-name = "ret";
+ arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x00000004>;
These suspend parameters look funky.. is this just a PSCI sleep
implementation that strays far away from Arm's suggested guidelines?

not really! it's just that 30th bit is set according to spec i.e
it's marked as a retention state.


[...]


+ CPU_PD11: power-domain-cpu11 {
+ #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+ power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
+ };
+
+ CLUSTER_PD: power-domain-cpu-cluster {
+ #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+ domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_CL4>, <&CLUSTER_CL5>;
+ };
So, can the 3 clusters not shut down their L2 and PLLs (if separate?)
on their own?

on CL5 the clusters are expected to shutdown their l2 and PLL on their
own.


+ };
+
+ reserved-memory {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ ranges;
+
+ gunyah_hyp_mem: gunyah-hyp@80000000 {
+ reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x800000>;
+ no-map;
+ };
+
+ hyp_elf_package_mem: hyp-elf_package@80800000 {
no underscores in node names, use hyphens

ack

-Sibi

The rest looks OK I think

Konrad