Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: Replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()
From: Christopher Li
Date: Wed Nov 29 2023 - 14:04:12 EST
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 3:41 AM Fabio M. De Francesco
<fabio.maria.de.francesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The kernel virtual addresses returned by these two API are
> > > only valid in the context of the callers (i.e., they cannot be handed to
> > > other threads).
> > >
> > > With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread and CPU local like
> > > in kmap_atomic(); however, they can handle page-faults and can be called
> > > from any context (including interrupts). The tasks that call
> > > kmap_local_page() can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run
> > > again, the kernel virtual addresses are restored and are still valid.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, the kmap_atomic() is the same as
> > kmap_local_page() with the following additional code before calling to
> > "__kmap_local_page_prot(page, prot)", which is common between these
> > two functions.
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> > migrate_disable();
> > else
> > preempt_disable();
> >
> > pagefault_disable();
> >
>
> This is what I tried to explain with that sentence. I think you overlooked it
> :)
I did read your description. It is not that I don't trust your
description. I want to see how the code does what you describe at the
source code level. In this case the related code is fairly easy to
isolate.
>
> BTW, please have a look at the Highmem documentation. It has initially been
> written by Peter Z. and I reworked and largely extended it authoring the
> patches with my gmail address (6 - 7 different patches, if I remember
> correctly).
>
> You will find there everything you may want to know about these API and how to
> do conversions from the older to the newer.
Will do, thanks for the pointer.
Chris