Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation on boot

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Gang Li wrote:

> > 
> > > And there, the 65.2s won't be noise because that 12TB system is up by a
> > > snap
> > > of a finger? :)
> > > 
> > 
> > In this single boot test, total boot time was 373.78s, so 1GB hugetlb
> > allocation is 17.4% of that.
> 
> Thank you for sharing these data. Currently, I don't have access to a machine
> of such large capacity, so the benefits in my tests are not as pronounced.
> 
> I believe testing on a system of this scale would yield significant benefits.
> 
> > 
> > Would love to see what the numbers would look like if 1GB pages were
> > supported.
> > 
> 
> Support for 1GB hugetlb is not yet perfect, so it wasn't included in v1. But
> I'm happy to refine and introduce 1GB hugetlb support in future versions.
> 

That would be very appreciated, thank you!  I'm happy to test and collect 
data for any proposed patch series on 12TB systems booted with a lot of 
1GB hugetlb pages on the kernel command line.