Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] genirq/irq_sim: misc updates

[Yury Norov]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:18:15AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Here are a couple of updates to the interrupt simulator. Two are minor:
> > remove an unused field and reorder includes for readability. The third
> > one simplifies the error paths by using new cleanup macros. To that end
> > we also add a cleanup definition for dynamic bitmaps.
> >
> > Resending rebased on top of v6.7-rc1 and with tags collected.
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - add a NULL-pointer check to the bitmap cleanup macro as advised by
> >   Peter Zijlstra
> > - initialize managed pointers when declaring them to create a clear pairing
> >   between the type and the cleanup action
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (4):
> >   bitmap: define a cleanup function for bitmaps
> >   genirq/irq_sim: remove unused field from struct irq_sim_irq_ctx
> >   genirq/irq_sim: order headers alphabetically
> >   genirq/irq_sim: shrink code by using cleanup helpers
> >
> >  include/linux/bitmap.h |  3 +++
> >  kernel/irq/irq_sim.c   | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
> 
> It's been two weeks since this submission and ~2.5 months since the
> first one so I guess, a gentle ping is in order. This is not a very
> controversial series - can this be applied?

Hi Bartosz,

I'm the first in the list for this series, but really only 1st patch
is related to bitmaps, and I already acked it. If you prefer that, I
can pull it in the bitmap tree.

Thanks,
Yury