Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs
From: Bagas Sanjaya
Date: Thu Nov 30 2023 - 03:04:49 EST
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 05:10:25PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On 11/29/23 20:53, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> >> On 11/29/23 08:25, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >>> I was prompted to write this little grammar fix series when reading
> >>> the fix from Attreyee [1], with review comments requesting changes
> >>> to that fix. So here's my version of the fix, with reviews from [1]
> >>> addressed (and distinct grammar fixes splitted).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Typical kernel workflow would be for Attreyee to incorporate feedback
> >> and post their v2 after a day or two. From the format they posted, it
> >> appears to be a first(ish) kernel contribution post. Let's be kind and
> >> patient so they we all may benefit from the practice of iterating on
> >> their patch.
> >>
> >
> > I do this posting because I thought the OP (Attreyee) didn't respond in
> > timely manner (just like random Chinese contributors like @cdjrlc.com
> > and @208suo.com people).
>
> Seriously? The original post was on Monday, yours came less than 48
> hours later. Not only can we not expect that kind of rapid turnaround
> from anybody, but we actively discourage rapid resending of patches.
> Rather than dig yourself in deeper, I suggest you simply apologize to
> the original poster and find something more useful to do.
Done, thanks!
And yes, I'm also focusing on regression tracking and Bugzilla
triaging.
Ciao, Bagas.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature