Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix example regulator node

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/12/2023 15:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:25:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> The example regulator child nodes do not have unit addresses so drop the
>> incorrect '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties from the parent
>> node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml    | 3 ---
>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml
>> index e36e5ce58136..60d5e6b3de33 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml
>> @@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ examples:
>>        interrupts = <0 0>;
>>  
>>        regulators {
>> -        #address-cells = <1>;
>> -        #size-cells = <0>;
>> -
> 
> It's the right fix, but I have to wonder why these are not schema 
> errors? Seems like something in the schemas needs fixing.
> 

Good point. The fix is just not sufficient.  This binding explicitly
allow it, so it should be removed there as well.

I retract my Ack/Review. :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof