Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/microcode: Rework early revisions reporting

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 12:33:34PM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> I'll get a dmesg shortly once i get my test system back.

Thanks.

> What I meant was 

I know what you meant. Did you see the diff I sent you?

It has the fix already:

@@ -410,13 +421,19 @@ void __init load_ucode_intel_bsp(struct early_load_data *ed)
 {
        struct ucode_cpu_info uci;

-       ed->old_rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
-
        uci.mc = get_microcode_blob(&uci, false);
-       if (uci.mc && apply_microcode_early(&uci) == UCODE_UPDATED)
+       ed->old_rev = uci.cpu_sig.rev;
+
+       uc_dbg("old_rev: 0x%x", ed->old_rev);
+
+       if (uci.mc && apply_microcode_early(&uci) == UCODE_UPDATED) {
                ucode_patch_va = UCODE_BSP_LOADED;
+               ed->new_rev = uci.cpu_sig.rev;
+
+               uc_dbg("updated, new_rev: 0x%x", ed->new_rev);
+       }
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The assignment is now inside the UCODE_UPDATED conditional.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette