Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] coresight: replicator: Move ACPI support from AMBA driver to platform driver

From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Sun Dec 03 2023 - 23:26:58 EST




On 12/1/23 18:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:50:47AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Add support for the dynamic replicator device in the platform driver, which
>> can then be used on ACPI based platforms. This change would now allow
>> runtime power management for repliacator devices on ACPI based systems.
>>
>> The driver would try to enable the APB clock if available. Also, rename the
>> code to reflect the fact that it now handles both static and dynamic
>> replicators.
>>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
>
> Except the minor nit below which may apply also for few other patches
> in the series
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> # For ACPI related changes
> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> # Boot and driver probe only
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> index b6be73034996..64de0bee02ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(replicator_devs, "replicator");
>> struct replicator_drvdata {
>> void __iomem *base;
>> struct clk *atclk;
>> + struct clk *pclk;
>
> [minor nit] Perhaps can be documented as well ?

Sure, will add the following comment above the structure.

@pclk: optional clock for the core parts of the replicator.