Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM4450 pinctrl driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/12/2023 09:06, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 12/4/2023 3:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 04/12/2023 02:57, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 11/30/2023 7:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>>> On 30/11/2023 03:40, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>> Add pinctrl driver for TLMM block found in SM4450 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig.msm      |    8 +
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile         |    1 +
>>>>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c | 1013 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    3 files changed, 1022 insertions(+)
>>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hm, was this patch ever built?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>> This patch has been built before, I will check and compare if there are
>>> any errors and changes when I submitted this patch series.
>>>
>>
>> No, it wasn't built. I just tried - applied it and:
>>
>> pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(struct
>> platform_device *)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘void (*)(struct
>> platform_device *)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>>    996 |         .remove = msm_pinctrl_remove,
>>        |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm4450.c:996:19: note: (near
>> initialization for ‘sm4450_tlmm_driver.remove’)
>>
>> So you just sent a patch which was not even compiled.
>>
>> NAK.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> I compiled all the related patches together, but I did not compile this 
> patch separately.

We talk about this patch here. Please do not send knowingly wrong code,
because it does not make sense and hurts bisectability.

> The fact that there is a compilation problem is known, but because the 
> patch is already reviewed-by, so a separate patch(patch 3) is submitted 
> to fix the compilation error.

That's not the process. Each patch must be correct. Each.

Best regards,
Krzysztof