Re: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi: fix up examples

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:16:22 +0100
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
> 
> This series addresses the iio/adc ones.

All look fine to me.  Just waiting for the DT folk to have time to take a look.
> 
> Johan
> 
> 
> Johan Hovold (6):
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix reg description
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix example node name
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: clean up example
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-rradc: clean up example
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix example node names
>   dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: clean up examples
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml    | 10 ++++++----
>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-rradc.yaml   |  4 ++--
>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml    |  9 +++++----
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>