Re: [PATCH] tty: max310x: work around regmap->regcache data corruption

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:29:05AM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:

> Do you have an example of a driver which is using regmap ranges like it
> should be done in this driver, that is using the exact same address for
> two or more registers? I found an example, but it doesn't seem
> applicable to the sc16is7xx driver because the two registers do not
> share a common address, for example they have addresses like 0x01 and
> 0x81, even though with the proper page selection, they finally map to
> address 0x01.

I don't understand what you mean here - you say that the addresses both
have addresses 0x1 and 0x81 but map to address 0x1.  What does the 0x81
refer to?  The comments in the driver seemed to indicate that there was
a single address which mapped to multiple underlying registers...

Searching for struct regmap_range_cfg should show a lot of users in
mainline.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature