Re: [PATCH] nvmem: fix issue within nvmem_register with fixed-layout.

From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Tue Dec 05 2023 - 04:05:13 EST


Hi Catalin,

+ GKH
+ Luca (who initially reported this issue)

catalin.popescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:48:27
+0000:

> Adding more people.
>
> On 30.11.23 17:29, Catalin Popescu wrote:
> > fixed-layout is natively supported by NVMEM framework.
> > Yet, it's not been declared as a supported layout. As a
> > result, nvmem_register always returns -EPROBE_DEFER if
> > configuration has no layout and the NVMEM provider DT
> > uses a fixed layout.
> >
> > As a fix, declare fixed-layout as a supported layout
> > and use add_cells callback to parse the cells. This adds
> > consistency over layouts parsing as fixed-layout parsing
> > is handled in the same way than others nvmem layouts.

I believe this patch (not taken yet) should fix your issue and should be
queued to fixes.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231124193814.360552-1-miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx/

However I like your approach which should probably be taken into
consideration for the next cycle, as I think it fits Rafal's
original idea pretty well.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Popescu <catalin.popescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvmem/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > index bf42b7e826db..3467c94207e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> > @@ -746,7 +746,9 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_legacy_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> > return nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, nvmem->dev.of_node);
> > }
> >
> > -static int nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> > +static int nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(struct device *dev,
> > + struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> > + struct nvmem_layout *layout)

I've sent another series (on top of the fix mentioned above) to
simplify a bit this list of parameters, so both will conflict. But that
will be easy to solve.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231129163737.698317-1-miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx/

> > {
> > struct device_node *layout_np;
> > int err = 0;
> > @@ -755,8 +757,7 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> > if (!layout_np)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (of_device_is_compatible(layout_np, "fixed-layout"))
> > - err = nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, layout_np);
> > + err = nvmem_add_cells_from_dt(nvmem, layout_np);
> >
> > of_node_put(layout_np);
> >
> > @@ -1003,10 +1004,6 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
> > goto err_remove_cells;
> > }
> >
> > - rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout(nvmem);
> > - if (rval)
> > - goto err_remove_cells;
> > -
> > rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_layout(nvmem);
> > if (rval)
> > goto err_remove_cells;
> > @@ -2126,6 +2123,19 @@ const char *nvmem_dev_name(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_dev_name);
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id fixed_layout_of_match_table[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "fixed-layout", },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fixed_layout_of_match_table);
> > +
> > +static struct nvmem_layout fixed_layout = {
> > + .name = "NVMEM fixed layout",
> > + .of_match_table = fixed_layout_of_match_table,
> > + .add_cells = nvmem_add_cells_from_fixed_layout,
> > +};
> > +module_nvmem_layout_driver(fixed_layout);
> > +
> > static int __init nvmem_init(void)
> > {
> > return bus_register(&nvmem_bus_type);
>
>

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,
Miquèl