On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis
to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can
be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c).
What tree is this against? It fails to apply to either Jens'
for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.
.