Re: [PATCH v9 17/32] timers: Introduce add_timer() variants which modify timer flags

From: Anna-Maria Behnsen
Date: Wed Dec 06 2023 - 04:24:53 EST


Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2023-12-01 10:26:39 [+0100], Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
>> Timer might be used as pinned timer (using add_timer_on()) and later on as
>> non pinned timers using add_timer(). When the NOHZ timer pull at expiry
>> model is in place, TIMER_PINNED flag is required to be used whenever a
>> timer needs to expire on a dedicated CPU. Flag must no be set, if
>> expiration on a dedicated CPU is not required.
>
> Slightly reworded.
>
> | A timer might be used as a pinned timer (using add_timer_on()) and later
> | on as non-pinned timer using add_timer(). When the "NOHZ timer pull at
> | expiry model" is in place, the TIMER_PINNED flag is required to be used
> | whenever a timer needs to expire on a dedicated CPU. Otherwise the flag
> | must not be set if expiration on a dedicated CPU is not required.
>
>> add_timer_on()'s behavior will be changed during the preparation patches
>> for the NOHZ timer pull at expiry model to unconditionally set TIMER_PINNED
>> flag. To be able to reset/set the flag when queueing a timer, two variants
>> of add_timer() are introduced.
>
> and here.
>
> | add_timer_on()'s behavior will be changed during the preparation patches
> | for the "NOHZ timer pull at expiry model" to unconditionally set
> | TIMER_PINNED flag. To be able to clear/ set the flag when queueing a
> | timer, two variants of add_timer() are introduced.
>
> I let you be judge of this.

I will take your reworded version.

Thanks,
Anna-Maria