Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add PCIe qcom,refclk-always-on property

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Wed Dec 06 2023 - 08:10:23 EST


On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:25:44PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/12/2023 13:30, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >> What I said before:
> >> "Again, third time (once from Bjorn, once from Dmitry), rephrase
> >> property name and description to describe the hardware issue. I see
> >> description improved, but not the property name. Again in the end of
> >> description you say what Linux should do. Bindings do not describe Linux
> >> OS."
> >>
> >
> > You didn't answer my question:
> >
> > "I see a plenty of properties similar to this one instructing the OS to keep some
> > resource ON to workaround hardware issues. So they are all wrong?"
>
> They are not the best, but it all depends on the individual case.
>
> >
> > If you say they are wrong, why are they approved in the first place?
> Because we don't have time to keep digging what the driver is doing and
> what is claimed in DT. Some people don't even CC us on the driver.
>

OK. How about, "qcom,broken-refclk"? This reflects the fact that the default
refclk operation is broken on this platform, so the OS should be prepared for
it (by keeping it always on).

- Mani

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்