Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall

[Miroslav Benes]

Hi,

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:

> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> 
> > 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
> > style problems, please review.
> > 
> > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
> >        them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> > 
> > I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script
> > showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your
> > output?
> > 
> > I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's
> > missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset.
> > 
> 
> Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on
> whether or not you would need a module name for this module?

I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In 
this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There 
is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please?

Miroslav