Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] supplement of slab allocator removal

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 12/3/23 01:14, sxwjean@xxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Patch 1 is to remove an unused parameter. This patch actually is v3, but
> it is not reasonable to add v3 tag in the cover letter, so I put the
> change history inside the patch.
> 
> ---
> Patch 2 is to replace slub_$params with slab_$params.
> Vlastimil Babka pointed out we should use "slab_$param" as the primary
> prefix for long-term plan. Please see [1] for more information.
> 
> This patch is to do that. However, the patch is big, I'm not sure if
> everything is proper in it, so I added "RFC" in the patch title. For more
> information please see the commit message of patch.
> 
> I did the basic tests with qemu, which passed values by sl[au]b_max_order,
> sl[au]b_min_order, sl[au]b_min_objects and sl[au]b_debug in command line.
> The values looks correct by printing them out before calculating orders.
> 
> One thing I'm not sure about the forth parameter of __setup_param(),
> Is it correct to set the parameter to 0 directly?

Yep it's fine.