Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] genirq/irq_sim: misc updates

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:47 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:18 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Here are a couple of updates to the interrupt simulator. Two are minor:
> > > remove an unused field and reorder includes for readability. The third
> > > one simplifies the error paths by using new cleanup macros. To that end
> > > we also add a cleanup definition for dynamic bitmaps.
> > >
> > > Resending rebased on top of v6.7-rc1 and with tags collected.
> > >
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > > - add a NULL-pointer check to the bitmap cleanup macro as advised by
> > >   Peter Zijlstra
> > > - initialize managed pointers when declaring them to create a clear pairing
> > >   between the type and the cleanup action
> > >
> > > Bartosz Golaszewski (4):
> > >   bitmap: define a cleanup function for bitmaps
> > >   genirq/irq_sim: remove unused field from struct irq_sim_irq_ctx
> > >   genirq/irq_sim: order headers alphabetically
> > >   genirq/irq_sim: shrink code by using cleanup helpers
> > >
> > >  include/linux/bitmap.h |  3 +++
> > >  kernel/irq/irq_sim.c   | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
> > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.40.1
> > >
> >
> > It's been two weeks since this submission and ~2.5 months since the
> > first one so I guess, a gentle ping is in order. This is not a very
> > controversial series - can this be applied?
> >
> > Bart
>
> Another ping...
>
> Bartosz

Thomas,

Is there any formal reason why this cannot be processed?

Bartosz