Re: [PATCH v2 30/33] s390/uaccess: Add KMSAN support to put_user() and get_user()

[Alexander Potapenko]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:03 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> put_user() uses inline assembly with precise constraints, so Clang is
> in principle capable of instrumenting it automatically. Unfortunately,
> one of the constraints contains a dereferenced user pointer, and Clang
> does not currently distinguish user and kernel pointers. Therefore
> KMSAN attempts to access shadow for user pointers, which is not a right
> thing to do.
>
> An obvious fix to add __no_sanitize_memory to __put_user_fn() does not
> work, since it's __always_inline. And __always_inline cannot be removed
> due to the __put_user_bad() trick.
>
> A different obvious fix of using the "a" instead of the "+Q" constraint
> degrades the code quality, which is very important here, since it's a
> hot path.
>
> Instead, repurpose the __put_user_asm() macro to define
> __put_user_{char,short,int,long}_noinstr() functions and mark them with
> __no_sanitize_memory. For the non-KMSAN builds make them
> __always_inline in order to keep the generated code quality. Also
> define __put_user_{char,short,int,long}() functions, which call the
> aforementioned ones and which *are* instrumented, because they call
> KMSAN hooks, which may be implemented as macros.
>
> The same applies to get_user() as well.
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I think this patch makes sense, but I don't feel myself qualified
enough to stamp it. Hope Heiko's ack is enough.