Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add imx95 pcie compatible string

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 06:28:43PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:44:26PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:58:37PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Add i.MX95 PCIe "fsl,imx95-pcie" compatible string.
> > > Add "atu" and "serdes" to reg-names.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Notes:
> > >     Change from v2 to v3
> > >     - Remove krzy's ACK tag
> > >     - Add condition check for imx95, which required more reg-names then old
> > >     platform, so need Krzy review again,
> > >     
> > >     Change from v1 to v2
> > >     - add Krzy's ACK tag
> > > 
> > >  .../bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> > > index 81bbb8728f0f9..b8fcf8258f031 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
> > >        - fsl,imx8mq-pcie
> > >        - fsl,imx8mm-pcie
> > >        - fsl,imx8mp-pcie
> > > +      - fsl,imx95-pcie
> > >  
> > >    reg:
> > >      items:
> > > @@ -90,6 +91,22 @@ required:
> > >  allOf:
> > >    - $ref: /schemas/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml#
> > >    - $ref: /schemas/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-common.yaml#
> > > +  - if:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        compatible:
> > > +          enum:
> > > +            - fsl,imx95-pcie
> > > +    then:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        reg:
> > > +          minItems: 4
> > > +        reg-names:
> > > +          items:
> > > +            - const: dbi
> > > +            - const: serdes
> > 
> > Did you test this? It should fail because 'serdes' would need to be 
> > added to snps,dw-pcie.yaml.
> 
> I run "make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=/pci/", no error report.

Only because you have no example. What about your actual .dts?

> And PCIe function can work.
> 
> > 
> > Is this really not a separate phy block?
> 
> This is misc block, which included phy and also include some registers
> about SID for each PCI devices. I plan do it later.

Sounds like it should be a separate node and use the phy binding. Do it 
correctly from the start, not later. Later is an ABI break.

What is SID?

Rob