Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/21] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED()

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Fri Dec 15 2023 - 11:12:51 EST

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] spmi: mtk-pmif: Serialize PMIF status check and command submission"
Previous message: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch: "[PATCH] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix undefined behavior"
In reply to: Russell King (Oracle): "[PATCH RFC v3 09/21] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED()"
Next in thread: Oracle: "[PATCH RFC v3 10/21] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:49:57 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Rather than ifdef'ing acpi_processor_post_eject() and its use site, use
> IS_ENABLED() to increase compile coverage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] spmi: mtk-pmif: Serialize PMIF status check and command submission"
Previous message: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch: "[PATCH] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix undefined behavior"
In reply to: Russell King (Oracle): "[PATCH RFC v3 09/21] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED()"
Next in thread: Oracle: "[PATCH RFC v3 10/21] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]