Re: [PATCH v8 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu

[Reinette Chatre]

Hi James,

On 12/15/2023 9:43 AM, James Morse wrote:
> When a CPU is taken offline resctrl may need to move the overflow or
> limbo handlers to run on a different CPU.
> 
> Once the offline callbacks have been split, cqm_setup_limbo_handler()
> will be called while the CPU that is going offline is still present
> in the cpu_mask.
> 
> Pass the CPU to exclude to cqm_setup_limbo_handler() and
> mbm_setup_overflow_handler(). These functions can use a variant of
> cpumask_any_but() when selecting the CPU. -1 is used to indicate no CPUs
> need excluding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>

Reinette