Re: [PATCH v7 34/39] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS test program built with the system libc

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Also, it's strange that the tests defined after map_gcs.stack_overflow
>> don't run when I execute this test program. I'm doing:
>
>> $ ./run_kselftest.sh -t arm64:libc-gcs
>
>> I.e., these tests aren't being run in my FVP:
>
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, too_small)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_1)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_2)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_3)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_4)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_5)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_6)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(map_invalid_gcs, unligned_7)
>> > +TEST_F(map_invalid_gcs, do_map)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(invalid_mprotect, exec)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(invalid_mprotect, bti)
>> > +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(invalid_mprotect, exec_bti)
>> > +TEST_F(invalid_mprotect, do_map)
>> > +TEST_F(invalid_mprotect, do_map_read)
>
> I'm seeing all of those appearing.  I'm not sure what to say there -
> that's all kselftest framework stuff, I'd expect the framework to say
> something about what it's doing if it decides to skip and I can't think
> why it would decide to skip.

Thanks. I'll poke some more to see if I can figure out what's going on.

-- 
Thiago