Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/62] 5.10.205-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:54:45AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Naresh Kamboju wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:54:13PM +0530:
> > commit that is causing build failure,
> > drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic begin and flush
> > [ Upstream commit f6ebe9f9c9233a6114eb922aba9a0c9ccc2d2e14 ]
> 
> I also had to fix up a few nxp-provided drivers because of this commits,
> it seems a bit heavy-handed for stable trees when users can have a
> couple of out of tree modules.
> 
> It's marked as a stable dep of fe4c5f662097 ("drm/mediatek: Add spinlock
> for setting vblank event in atomic_begin") but that looks like it's only
> because of the context and it should be easy to backport that commit
> without the crtc atomic begin/flush rework -- what do you think?

Good catch, I've dropped those two larger dependent patches now and
fixed up the spinlock patch by hand to work properly.

I'll push out a -rc2 now, thanks!

greg k-h