Re: MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:53:18PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > When sending an email to SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, the server
> >> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
> >> 
> >> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list 
> >> and I am not getting a bounce message.
> >
> > I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
> > accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
> > 21st century, for (better or) worse...
> 
> And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't
> have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong.
> We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file.
> 

I'm also using gmail (and GMX as backup). When I sent my reply about rPI
testing [1] with SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cc'ed, I got `Address
not found` error instead (but the DSN message was in spam folder instead
as I treated it as junk).

For Infineon, they're now focusing on TPM subsystem, with the latest message
is 6 months (or a semester in academic speak) ago [2].

Thanks.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZYLKftqKFJ_PMmF3@xxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613180259.3525-4-Alexander.Steffen@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature