Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] genirq/irq_sim: misc updates

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:17:38PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:14 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:47 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:18 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > > > It's been two weeks since this submission and ~2.5 months since the
> > > > first one so I guess, a gentle ping is in order. This is not a very
> > > > controversial series - can this be applied?
> > >
> > > Another ping...
> >
> > Is there any formal reason why this cannot be processed?
>
> Ping.

Instead you can now just say that you are going to apply this via your tree,
if there won't be objections, e.g., within a week (or two as it's a holiday
season).

In the PR to Linus you can explain why it's taken like this.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko