Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/7] landlock: Log file-related requests

[Paul Moore]

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:17 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add audit support for mkdir, mknod, symlink, unlink, rmdir, truncate,
> and open requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/landlock/audit.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/landlock/audit.h |  32 +++++++++++
>  security/landlock/fs.c    |  62 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
> index d9589d07e126..148fc0fafef4 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,25 @@
>
>  atomic64_t ruleset_and_domain_counter = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
>
> +static const char *op_to_string(enum landlock_operation operation)
> +{
> +       const char *const desc[] = {
> +               [0] = "",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_MKDIR] = "mkdir",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_MKNOD] = "mknod",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_SYMLINK] = "symlink",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_UNLINK] = "unlink",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_RMDIR] = "rmdir",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_TRUNCATE] = "truncate",
> +               [LANDLOCK_OP_OPEN] = "open",
> +       };

If you're going to be using a single AUDIT_LANDLOCK record type, do
you want to somehow encode that the above are access/permission
requests in the "op=" field name?

> +static void
> +log_request(const int error, struct landlock_request *const request,
> +           const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> +           const access_mask_t access_request,
> +           const layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
> +{
> +       struct audit_buffer *ab;
> +
> +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!error))
> +               return;
> +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!request))
> +               return;
> +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!domain || !domain->hierarchy))
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* Uses GFP_ATOMIC to not sleep. */
> +       ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
> +                            AUDIT_LANDLOCK);
> +       if (!ab)
> +               return;
> +
> +       update_request(request, domain, access_request, layer_masks);
> +
> +       log_task(ab);
> +       audit_log_format(ab, " domain=%llu op=%s errno=%d missing-fs-accesses=",
> +                        request->youngest_domain,
> +                        op_to_string(request->operation), -error);
> +       log_accesses(ab, request->missing_access);
> +       audit_log_lsm_data(ab, &request->audit);
> +       audit_log_end(ab);
> +}

See my previous comments about record format consistency.

--
paul-moore.com