Re: [PATCH] regulator: MAINTAINERS: add status for IRQ helpers

[Matti Vaittinen]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 12/18/23 12:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Each maintainer entry should have a status field:
>
>    $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=sections
>    ./MAINTAINERS:23368: warning: section without status
>
> Fixes: d55444adedae ("MAINTAINERS: Add reviewer for regulator irq_helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 30322190a72f..6fd22db830f5 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -23367,6 +23367,7 @@ K:	regulator_get_optional
>   
>   VOLTAGE AND CURRENT REGULATOR IRQ HELPERS
>   R:	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
> +S:	Maintained

Isn't that a bit odd seeing the M: - entry is missing as well?

This entry falls under the drivers/regulator, and as such, is maintained 
by Mark (and the "umbrella" entry VOLTAGE AND CURRENT REGULATOR 
FRAMEWORK has all needed bits and pieces, like the M: and S:).

I think the current MAINTAINERS entries reflect the reality. Mark (and 
Liam) are THE regulator guy(s). I am just doing bits and pieces here and 
there, like reviewing the changes to these helpers.

I guess that from a technical POV duplicating the S: and M: here is a 
bit pointless, and as all duplicates, adds overhead when changes are done.

I am happy with the existing entries, but seems like everyone else is 
not. Still, having S: without M: can be a source of confusion. If S: is 
required, maybe add Mark as M: here as well. (Or if this is not Ok with 
Mark, switch my R to M - which in my opinion is still a bit pointless as 
the changes to drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c will flow through Mark's 
hands in any case :] )

>   F:	drivers/regulator/irq_helpers.c
>   
>   VRF


Yours,
	-- Matti

--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~