Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] Documentation: devicetree: Clarify wording for wakeup-source property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/12/2023 00:54, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> The wording in the current documentation is a little strong. The
> intention was not to fix any particular interrupt as wakeup capable but
> leave those details to the device. It wasn't intended to enforce any
> rules as what can be or can't be a wakeup interrupt.
> 
> Soften the wording to not mandate that the 'wakeup-source' property be
> used, and clarify what it means when an interrupt is marked (or not
> marked) for wakeup.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZYAjxxHcCOgDVMTQ@bogus/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_Jsq+MYwOG40X26cYmO9EkZ9xqWrXDi03MaRfxnV-+VGkXWQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching.

You nicely skipped all my filters... No need to resend to fix this, but
fix it if sending a new version.

Best regards,
Krzysztof