Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Include pinmap in RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK() macro

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 1:13 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:16 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently we assume all the port pins are sequential ie always PX_0 to
> > PX_n (n=1..7) exist, but on RZ/Five SoC we have additional pins P19_1 to
> > P28_5 which have holes in them, for example only one pin on port19 is
> > available and that is P19_1 and not P19_0. So to handle such cases
> > include pinmap for each port which would indicate the pin availability
> > on each port. As the pincount can be calculated based on pinmap drop this
> > from RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK() macro and update RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_PINCNT()
> > macro.
> >
> > Previously we had a max of 7 pins on each port but on RZ/Five Port-20
> > has 8 pins, so move the single pin configuration to BIT(63).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> > @@ -80,15 +80,17 @@
> >   * n indicates number of pins in the port, a is the register index
> >   * and f is pin configuration capabilities supported.
> >   */
> > -#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f)  (((n) << 28) | ((a) << 20) | (f))
> > -#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_PINCNT(x)  (((x) & GENMASK(30, 28)) >> 28)
> > +#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f)  (((n) > 0 ? ((u64)(GENMASK_ULL(((n) - 1 + 28), 28))) : 0) | \
>
> The mask creation can be simplified to
>
>     ((1ULL << (n)) - 1) << 28
>
OK.

> but see below...
>
> > +                                        ((a) << 20) | (f))
> > +#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_PINMAP(x)  (((x) & GENMASK_ULL(35, 28)) >> 28)
> > +#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_PINCNT(x)  (hweight8(RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_PINMAP((x))))
>
> I think we've reached the point where it would be easier for the
> casual reviewer to #define PIN_CFG_*_MASK for all fields, and use
> FIELD_{PREP,GET}() to pack resp. extract values.  That would also
> make it more obvious which bits are in use, and how many bits are
> still available for future use.
>
If I use the FIELD_PREP() macro like below I get build issues as below:

#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_CNT_MASK    GENMASK(31, 28)
#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_REG_MASK    GENMASK(27, 20)
#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_CFG_MASK    GENMASK(19, 0)
#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f)
FIELD_PREP(RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_CNT_MASK, n) | \
                    FIELD_PREP(RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_REG_MASK, a) | \
                    FIELD_PREP(RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_CFG_MASK, f)


drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c:91:41: note: in expansion of
macro 'FIELD_PREP'
   91 |
FIELD_PREP(RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PIN_CFG_MASK, f)
      |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c:1486:9: note: in expansion of
macro 'RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK'
 1486 |         RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(6, 0x2a,
RZG3S_MPXED_PIN_FUNCS(A)),                        /* P18 */
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Do you have any pointers?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> >
> >  /*
> > - * BIT(31) indicates dedicated pin, p is the register index while
> > + * BIT(63) indicates dedicated pin, p is the register index while
> >   * referencing to SR/IEN/IOLH/FILxx registers, b is the register bits
> >   * (b * 8) and f is the pin configuration capabilities supported.
> >   */
> > -#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN               BIT(31)
> > +#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN               BIT_ULL(63)
> >  #define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_PACK(p, b, f) (RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN | \
> >                                          ((p) << 24) | ((b) << 20) | (f))
> >  #define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_GET_BIT(x)    (((x) & GENMASK(22, 20)) >> 20)
>
> Likewise.
>
> > @@ -180,12 +182,12 @@ struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
> >
> >  struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs {
> >         const char *name;
> > -       u32 config;
> > +       u64 config;
> >  };
>
> The rest LGTM.  It's a pity we have to switch to 64 bits, but I'm
> afraid there is not much we can do about that...
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds