Re: [PATCH] tty/sysrq: Dump kernel ring buffer messages via sysrq
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Fri Dec 22 2023 - 14:43:43 EST
On 12/22/23 03:44, Sreenath Vijayan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:12:46PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/23 08:52, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:09:53PM +0530, Sreenath Vijayan wrote:
>>>> When terminal is unresponsive, one cannot use dmesg to view kernel
>>>> ring buffer messages. Also, syslog services may be disabled,
>>>> to check them after a reboot, especially on embedded systems.
>>>> In this scenario, dump the kernel ring buffer messages via sysrq
>>>> by pressing sysrq+D.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sreenath Vijayan <sreenath.vijayan@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shimoyashiki Taichi <taichi.shimoyashiki@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/admin-guide/sysrq.rst | 2 ++
>>>> drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysrq.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysrq.rst
>>>> index 2f2e5bd440f9..464c4e138b9d 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysrq.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysrq.rst
>>>> @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ Command Function
>>>> will be printed to your console. (``0``, for example would make
>>>> it so that only emergency messages like PANICs or OOPSes would
>>>> make it to your console.)
>>>> +
>>>> +``D`` Dump the kernel ring buffer
>>>> =========== ===================================================================
>>>
>>> Nit, this doesn't line up anymore :(
>>
>> Yes, that will cause a docs build warning.
>
> Thank you for the review comments. When I apply the patch, I don't
> notice any alignment issues in the document. I tried with multiple
> editors(vim,emacs) and the combination of tabs and spaces looks to
> be the same as in the existing lines above the newly added line.
> Tried "make htmldocs" and no warnings were observed and the html
> page looks ok. Please suggest the modifications to be done.
You are correct. Sorry for the confusion. It can be messy trying to
read/review a diff when there is alignment involved.
>>
>> Also, can you be more explicit about which ring buffer this patch
>> is referring to, please.
>>
>
> We see the term "kernel ring buffer" used throughout the documents
> and commit messages, and thought it is the right term. Even dmesg
> manual page uses it. Would "kernel log buffer" be a more appropriate
> term? Please share your suggestion.
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt refers to:
ftrace ring buffer
printk ring buffer
tracing ring buffer
so saying "kernel ring buffer" is not very specific.
I expect that you are referring to the printk ring buffer, although
I would prefer to call it something like the console log buffer (FWIW).
thanks.
--
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html