Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy_irq in binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 22/12/2023 07:36, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> The high speed related interrupts present on QC targets are as follows:
> 


>  
>    interrupt-names:
> -    minItems: 1
> -    maxItems: 4
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 5
>  
>    qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk:
>      description:
> @@ -361,60 +378,21 @@ allOf:
>          compatible:
>            contains:
>              enum:
> -              - qcom,ipq4019-dwc3

Why do you remove it, without adding it somewhere else. Nothing in the
commit msg explains it.

> +              - qcom,ipq5018-dwc3
>                - qcom,ipq6018-dwc3
> -              - qcom,ipq8064-dwc3
>                - qcom,ipq8074-dwc3
> -              - qcom,msm8994-dwc3
> -              - qcom,qcs404-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sc7180-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sdm670-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sdm845-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sdx55-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sdx65-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sdx75-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm4250-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm6350-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8150-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8250-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8350-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8450-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8550-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm8650-dwc3
> -    then:
> -      properties:
> -        interrupts:
> -          items:
> -            - description: The interrupt that is asserted
> -                when a wakeup event is received on USB2 bus.
> -            - description: The interrupt that is asserted
> -                when a wakeup event is received on USB3 bus.
> -            - description: Wakeup event on DM line.
> -            - description: Wakeup event on DP line.
> -        interrupt-names:
> -          items:
> -            - const: hs_phy_irq
> -            - const: ss_phy_irq
> -            - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> -            - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> -
> -  - if:
> -      properties:
> -        compatible:
> -          contains:
> -            enum:
>                - qcom,msm8953-dwc3
> -              - qcom,msm8996-dwc3
>                - qcom,msm8998-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm6115-dwc3
> -              - qcom,sm6125-dwc3
> +              - qcom,qcm2290-dwc3
>      then:
>        properties:
>          interrupts:
> -          maxItems: 2
> +          minItems: 2
> +          maxItems: 3
>          interrupt-names:
>            items:
> -            - const: hs_phy_irq
> +            - const: pwr_event
> +            - const: qusb2_phy
>              - const: ss_phy_irq
>  
>    - if:
> @@ -422,37 +400,21 @@ allOf:
>          compatible:
>            contains:
>              enum:
> -              - qcom,ipq5018-dwc3
> -              - qcom,ipq5332-dwc3
> +              - qcom,msm8996-dwc3
> +              - qcom,qcs404-dwc3
>                - qcom,sdm660-dwc3
> -    then:
> -      properties:
> -        interrupts:
> -          minItems: 1
> -          maxItems: 2
> -        interrupt-names:
> -          minItems: 1
> -          items:
> -            - const: hs_phy_irq
> -            - const: ss_phy_irq
> -
> -  - if:
> -      properties:
> -        compatible:
> -          contains:
> -            enum:
> -              - qcom,sc7280-dwc3
> +              - qcom,sm6115-dwc3
> +              - qcom,sm6125-dwc3
>      then:
>        properties:
>          interrupts:
>            minItems: 3
>            maxItems: 4
>          interrupt-names:
> -          minItems: 3
>            items:
> +            - const: pwr_event
>              - const: hs_phy_irq
> -            - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> -            - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> +            - const: qusb2_phy

Why qusb2_phy is after hs_phy_irq? In the earlier if:then: it is the
second one.


>              - const: ss_phy_irq
>  
>    - if:
> @@ -460,11 +422,13 @@ allOf:
>          compatible:
>            contains:
>              enum:
> +              - qcom,ipq5332-dwc3
>                - qcom,sc8280xp-dwc3
>                - qcom,x1e80100-dwc3
>      then:
>        properties:
>          interrupts:
> +          minItems: 3

Hm, why? This commit is unmanageable. Your commit msg is already huge
but still does not explain this. Are you sure you are fixing only one
logical thing per patch? Does not look like.

Best regards,
Krzysztof