Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] iommufd: Add data structure for Intel VT-d stage-1 cache invalidation

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:50:07AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:

> > - Reuse Nicolin's vRID->pRID mapping. If thevRID->pRID mapping is
> > maintained, then intel iommu can report a vRID back to user. But intel
> > iommu driver does not have viommu context, no place to hold the vRID-
> > >pRID
> > mapping. TBH. It may require other reasons to introduce it other than the
> > error reporting need. Anyhow, this requires more thinking and also has
> > dependency even if it is doable in intel side.
> 
> this sounds like a cleaner way to inject knowledge which iommu driver
> requires to find out the user tag. but yes it's a bit weird to introduce
> viommu awareness in intel iommu driver when there is no such thing
> in real hardware.
> 
> and for this error reporting case what we actually require is the
> reverse map i.e. pRID->vRID. Not sure whether we can leverage the
> same RID mapping uAPI as for ARM/AMD but ignore viommu_id
> and then store vRID under device_domain_info. a bit tricky on
> life cycle management and also incompatible with SIOV...
> 
> let's see whether Jason has a better idea here.

I think v10 is OK

struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate {
	__u32 size;
	__u32 hwpt_id;
	__aligned_u64 data_uptr;
	__u32 data_type;
	__u32 entry_len;
	__u32 entry_num;
	__u32 __reserved;
};

Sends the invalidation to the HWPT which matches what Intel wanted
where the entire HWPT and all its associated devices are
invalidated. No seperate per-device invalidation.

For error and event reporting they should be returned to userspace
with the IOMMU dev_id indicating the originating PCI function.

The VMM would have to convert dev_id into vRID according to the vIOMMU
instance that the device is hooked up.

In iommu land we should never have a "RID" but always some kind of
device-specific "device ID" which is the index into the particular HW
table, and that ID is naturally scoped to within the IOMMU instance
that owns the table - so it is very much not a global ID that can be
used alone in any of the uAPI.

The uAPI should use the iommufd device ID to refer to specific
devices.

Jason