Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clk: sprd: Add UMS9620 support
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Jan 04 2024 - 04:21:20 EST
On 04/01/2024 10:09, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 16:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/12/2023 09:51, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>>> Add UMS9620's clock compatible strings and descriptions for clock
>>> and clock-names for UMS9620.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml | 79 ++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml
>>> index 43d2b6c31357..dcad41a1fea7 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml
>>> @@ -30,25 +30,38 @@ properties:
>>> - sprd,ums512-mm-clk
>>> - sprd,ums512-mm-gate-clk
>>> - sprd,ums512-apapb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-pmu-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g1-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g5l-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g5r-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g8-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g9-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-g10-pll
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-apapb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-ap-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-apahb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-aon-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-aonapb-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-topdvfs-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-ipaapb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-ipa-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-ipaglb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-ipadispc-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-pcieapb-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-pcie-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-mm-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-mm-clk
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-dpu-vsp-gate
>>> + - sprd,ums9620-dpu-vsp-clk
>>>
>>> "#clock-cells":
>>> const: 1
>>>
>>> clocks:
>>> - minItems: 1
>>> - maxItems: 4
>>
>> No, constraints stay here.
>>
>>> description: |
>>> The input parent clock(s) phandle for the clock, only list
>>> fixed clocks which are declared in devicetree.
>>>
>>> - clock-names:
>>
>> No, you cannot just drop properties. Widest constraints stay here.
>>
>>> - minItems: 1
>>> - items:
>>> - - const: ext-26m
>>> - - const: ext-32k
>>> - - const: ext-4m
>>> - - const: rco-100m
>>> -
>>> reg:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>>
>>> @@ -57,7 +70,43 @@ required:
>>> - '#clock-cells'
>>> - reg
>>>
>>> -additionalProperties: false
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + pattern: "^sprd,ums512-.*"
>>> +
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + clocks:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + maxItems: 4
>>> +
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: ext-26m
>>> + - const: ext-32k
>>> + - const: ext-4m
>>> + - const: rco-100m
>>> +
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + pattern: "^sprd,ums9620-.*"
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + clocks:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + maxItems: 6
>>> +
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + maxItems: 6
>>
>> Missing names.
>
> The names are fixed, but the order are not.
Order must be fixed.
>
> For example:
> clk_a {
> clocks = <&ext_26m>, <&ext_32k>;
> clock-names = "ext-26m", "ext-32k";
> };
>
> clk_b {
> clocks = <&ext_26m>, <&ext_4m>;
> clock-names = "ext-26m", "ext-4m";
And here the order is fixed...
> };
>
> How to list the names for this kind of case? (Please forgive me for
> being lazy, didn't find a similar case after a fast search)
The same ums512 lists them or mentioned other bindings. You somehow cut
the quote...
Best regards,
Krzysztof