Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] dt-bindings: rtc: sophgo: add RTC support for Sophgo CV1800 series SoC

[Jingbao Qiu]

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 4:04 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2024 08:22, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > Add RTC devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800 SoC.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml       | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..01a926cb5c81
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/sophgo,cv1800-rtc.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Real Time Clock of the Sophgo CV1800 SoC
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>
> Why the allOf has moved?

Hi,
Do you mean allof should be under maintainers? Or other meanings.

>
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +description:
> > +  Real Time Clock (RTC) is an independently powered module
> > +  within the chip, which includes a 32KHz oscillator and a
> > +  Power On Reset/POR submodule. It can be used for time display
> > +  and timed alarm generation. In addition, the hardware state
> > +  machine provides triggering and timing control for chip
> > +  power on, off, and reset.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: sophgo,cv1800-rtc
> > +      - const: syscon
>
> Why is this syscon? Description does not explain this.

Because the driver of the submodule POR in RTC only requires register
address and range to work, according to what you said, it is only a compatible
attribute and does not need to be a child node.

So I wrote the following in the changelog.

- add syscon attribute to share registers
  with POR

Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu