Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Rename img,powervr to img,powervr-rogue

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/01/2024 20:33, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 1/9/24 1:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/01/2024 20:04, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> On 1/9/24 12:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 09/01/2024 18:19, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>>>> This binding will be used for GPUs starting from Series6 (Rogue)
>>>>> and later. A different binding document will describe Series5.
>>>>> With that the name "img,powervr" is too generic, rename to
>>>>> "img,powervr-rogue" to avoid confusion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Frank Binns <frank.binns@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Why do you send new version while we still talk about previous?
>>>>
>>>> Please implement feedback from v1 (and this is v2, so next is v3) or
>>>> keep discussing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I agreed with everything you said in the last round (RFC v2) and
>>> made all requested changes. Did I miss something in this version?
>>
>> The recommendation is that naming of the file matches generic compatible
>> and your file has only one generic compatible. Therefore I don't
>> understand why you claimed there are multiple compatibles.
>>
> 
> I said "There are (or will be) multiple compatible strings", the rest

OK.

> are on the way. So I didn't want to make this file less generic when
> other bindings are almost ready.
> 
> Frank, can you help here, I'm assuming you have "img,img-bxs" and
> "img,img-8xe" bindings staged for upstreaming somewhere; you'll be
> putting those in this same file, right?
> 

That's fine then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof