Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions

[Google]

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:13:51 +0000
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > @@ -388,6 +389,7 @@ struct rb_irq_work {
> > >  	bool				waiters_pending;
> > >  	bool				full_waiters_pending;
> > >  	bool				wakeup_full;
> > > +	bool				is_cpu_buffer;
> > 
> > I think 'is_cpu_buffer' is a bit unclear (or generic),
> > what about 'meta_page_update'?
> 
> Hum not sure about that change. This was really to identify if parent of
> rb_irq_work is a cpu_buffer or a trace_buffer. It can be a cpu_buffer regardless
> of the need to update the meta-page.

Yeah, I just meant that is "for_cpu_buffer", not "rb_irq_work is_cpu_buffer".
So when reading the code, I just felt uncomfortable.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>