Re: [PATCH for-next v4 2/2] RDMA/rxe: Remove rxe_info from rxe_set_mtu

[Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)]

On 09/01/2024 17:20, Greg Sword wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:41 PM Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> commit 9ac01f434a1e ("RDMA/rxe: Extend dbg log messages to err and info")
>> newly added this info. But it did only show null device when
>> the rdma_rxe is being loaded because dev_name(rxe->ib_dev->dev)
>> has not yet been assigned at the moment:
>>
>> "(null): rxe_set_mtu: Set mtu to 1024"
>>
>> Remove it to silent this message, check the mtu from it backend link
>> instead if needed.
>>
>> CC: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> V4: Remove it rather than re-order rxe_set_mtu() and rxe_register_device()
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c | 2 --
>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
>> index a086d588e159..ae466e72fc43 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe.c
>> @@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ void rxe_set_mtu(struct rxe_dev *rxe, unsigned int ndev_mtu)
>>
>>          port->attr.active_mtu = mtu;
>>          port->mtu_cap = ib_mtu_enum_to_int(mtu);
>> -
>> -       rxe_info_dev(rxe, "Set mtu to %d\n", port->mtu_cap);
> 
> I'd like to keep this statement so I can tell if the mtu setup was
> successful or not.

During the module loading, once it's loaded successfully, the mtu is set as well.

The another caller rxe_notify()->rxe_set_mtu() already had its own dbg message for this,
people can enable the dbg if needed.

Anyway, I'm open to your point.


Thanks
Zhijian


> 
>>   }
>>
>>   /* called by ifc layer to create new rxe device.
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>>
>>