Re: [PATCH 0/4] overlayfs: Adjustments for ovl_fill_super()
From: Amir Goldstein
Date: Wed Jan 10 2024 - 07:49:48 EST
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:25 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:38:23 +0200
> >
> > Some update suggestions were taken into account
> > from static source code analysis.
> >
> > Markus Elfring (4):
> > Return directly for two checks
> > Improve two size determinations
> > Improve exception handling
> > Move some assignments for the variable “err”
> >
> > fs/overlayfs/super.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> Is this patch series still in review queues?
>
Sorry, this series was not on my radar.
> See also:
> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/87b65f8e-abde-2aff-4da8-df6e0b464677@xxxxxx/
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00115.html
>
I will queue cleanup patches 1-2, but I do not like patches 3/4 and 4/4.
I do not think that they make the code better to read or maintain.
Thanks,
Amir.