Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] tpm: tis-i2c: Add more compatible strings

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 09:54:19AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> 
> On 1/10/24 09:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 10/01/2024 15:31, Ninad Palsule wrote:
> > > Hello Krzysztof,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > > > I have send it as a separate commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20231214144954.3833998-1-ninad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > > Why did you do that? It now just adds undocumented compatibles to the
> > > > > > driver. Please, as Rob requested, work with Lukas on his series to make
> > > > > > sure that these devices are documented.
> > > > > I think krzysztof kozlowski suggested to send these patches separately:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1c5ace65-2fd8-4503-b22f-e0f564d1c83f@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Did I misunderstood it? Do you guys want me to include that commit again?
> > > > My comment was in DTS thread under specific DTS patch. How did you
> > > > figure out it applies to driver and bindings? This does not make sense.
> > > Sorry for the misunderstanding. Where do you want me to add driver
> > > patch? Before all DTS patches or after all DTS patches?
> > Does not matter, why do you insist on combining them with DTS? Drivers
> > and bindings are going together. DTS better separate, although depending
> > on the case can be together.
> > 
> I have combined DTS and Driver because DTS was using compatibility string
> which is not upstream yet hence I thought it is logical to send it under
> same patchset.
> 
> Conor and Rob, Do you have preference?

I'm not sure what you want from me that Krzysztof hasn't already
provided. dt-bindings and drivers usually go together, and the dts
patches are often in the same series. If you send dts separately, note
under the --- line the patches adding the binding so that the platform
maintainer knows that the compatible has not yet been documented.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature