On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 6:33 AM Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Sheng Yong <shengyong@xxxxxxxx>
Compressed cluster may not be released due to we can fail in
release_compress_blocks(), fix to handle reserved compressed
cluster correctly in reserve_compress_blocks().
Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression")
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 026d05a7edd8..782ae3be48f6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -3624,6 +3624,15 @@ static int reserve_compress_blocks(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t count)
goto next;
}
+ /*
+ * compressed cluster was not released due to
+ * it fails in release_compress_blocks().
+ */
+ if (blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
+ compr_blocks++;
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(blkaddr)) {
compr_blocks++;
continue;
How about merging two conditions like "blkaddr == NEW_ADDR ||
__is_valid_data_blkaddr(blkaddr)"?
@@ -3633,6 +3642,9 @@ static int reserve_compress_blocks(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t count)
}
reserved = cluster_size - compr_blocks;
+ if (!reserved)
+ goto next;
+
How can the reserved variable be zero?
ret = inc_valid_block_count(sbi, dn->inode, &reserved);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel